Sergey Oboguev ([info]oboguev) wrote,
@ 2008-03-15 02:25:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Нашёл замечательную статью трактующую почему "демократический истэблишмент" в странах запада любит негров, иммигрантов из обществ поуродливее и прочие отбросы общества.

Объяснение даётся в терминах классовой, вернее кастовой теории.

Вкратце: каста прогрессивных интеллектуалов объединяется с кастой люмпенов и underclass-ом для того чтобы замочить касту мелких буржуа и касту аристократии и сохранить за собой власть.
What the Dalit alliance gives progressives is more than just a vote bank. What the Dalits are is muscle, a militia, a mob. And if you don't think that a paramilitary gang is an asset for a political party, your friends in the universities have not educated you well.

This is why the wonderful world of 2008, with its iPhones and everything, still contains "Black Kings." It is nothing more than nostalgia. If racist Republican pig cops tried to roll up the Democrats' underprivileged community organizations, I'm sure they would get nowhere - which may be why they don't even try. But, in 2008, would it do any serious damage to the progressive movement? I am confident that it wouldn't. Defending criminals is just a reflex for today's progressives.

The progressives no longer need muscle. They are in the saddle. There are no more Grayson Kirks, let alone Bull Connors. What they need now is votes, and the biggest vote bank of all is just south of the border. Immigration will keep the progressives in power for the next century. They always have been the American PRI, and they always will be.

And I haven't even stated my theory yet.

Fortunately, it's not my theory. It is a very old theory. Perhaps it even predates Mencius himself. It comes from China, so he would recognize it, and it has a catchy name: yi yi zhi yi.

This roughly translates as "using the barbarians to control the barbarians." Typically the implication is that when you have a problem with some tribe of barbarians, what you need to do is look for a bunch of even nastier barbarians, and sic them on the original barbarians. Ideally, the nastier barbarians are so barbaric that they are not conceivably a threat to you, the sophisticated mandarins of the Middle Kingdom, but still nasty enough to distract your real enemies on the frontiers, who may have learned to read and write or something. When the Romans unleashed the Huns against the Germans, it was a classic case of yi yi zhi yi.

Does this remind anyone of the real meaning of diversity? I'd like to think it's obvious. But perhaps I should just spell it out...

Fortunately, it's not my theory. It is a very old theory. Perhaps it even predates Mencius himself. It comes from China, so he would recognize it, and it has a catchy name: yi yi zhi yi.

This roughly translates as "using the barbarians to control the barbarians." Typically the implication is that when you have a problem with some tribe of barbarians, what you need to do is look for a bunch of even nastier barbarians, and sic them on the original barbarians. Ideally, the nastier barbarians are so barbaric that they are not conceivably a threat to you, the sophisticated mandarins of the Middle Kingdom, but still nasty enough to distract your real enemies on the frontiers, who may have learned to read and write or something. When the Romans unleashed the Huns against the Germans, it was a classic case of yi yi zhi yi.

Does this remind anyone of the real meaning of diversity? I'd like to think it's obvious. But perhaps I should just spell it out.

Did you watch that Mandela video? The man next to Mandela is Joe Slovo. One of South Africa's leading progressives active in the liberation struggle. Or, as some might say, Communist terrorists. Do you wonder why this pasty-faced fellow is comfortable in a crowd full of people chanting "kill the whites?"

Actually, the captions on the video are mistranslated. The word in the song is amaBhulu, a Xhosa racial slur which refers not to all whites, but specifically to Afrikaners. Which Slovo (being a cosmopolitan Anglophone) is most definitely not. So the crowd is essentially chanting "kill the rednecks," ie, Slovo's hereditary tribal enemies. No wonder he has a smile on his face. Yi yi zhi yi.

Про параллели с РФ молчу.


(Post a new comment)

Голдмен энд Закс это кто?
[info]paidiev
2008-03-15 10:59 am UTC (link)
Интеллектуалы? Ну вообще-то да.

(Reply to this)


[info]shadow_ru
2008-03-15 12:52 pm UTC (link)
Здраво.

(Reply to this)


[info]ai_sur
2008-03-15 05:18 pm UTC (link)
Рад что этот автор Вам понравился..

(Reply to this)


[info]suhov
2008-03-15 05:54 pm UTC (link)
Замечательное и смешное чтение, спасибо. Интересен там также вот такой способ определения "Кому на Руси жить хорошо" (перевёл):

1. Кто скорее всего будет богаче, если мы случайно выберем представителя национальности А или Б?
2. В физических конфликтах между А и Б, кто скорее всего окажется агрессор - А или Б?
3. При прочих равных условиях, кого правовая система наказывает сильнее - А или Б?
4. При прочих равных условиях, в экономическом соперничестве между А и Б, кто вероятнее выиграет? Если человек ищет работу на госдолжности или хочет пойти в университет, кого скорее всего возьмут - А или Б?
5. Если Б груб или агрессивен по отношению к А - это ближе к социальной маргинальности, то есть дальше от общепринятых норм поведения для представителей его национальности, чем наоборот, если А агрессивен или груб по отношению к Б?

В статье говорится что белые американцы проигрывают неграм по всем пунктам кроме первого. Похоже в РФ у коренного населения даже и с первым пунктом могут быть проблемы.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…